Selecting the right standard form of contract is important to the success of any project in the Middle East. It is even more important when the project involves engineering with a significant testing and commissioning element to demonstrate that the completed plant performs and operates in accordance with the employer's set of output requirements.
Middle East Perspective: Choosing the Right Standard Form of Contract for Engineering Projects: A Comparative Analysis of FIDIC and IChemE
The FIDIC suite of contracts are traditionally the contracts of choice for international projects. In the Middle East, the FIDIC forms are dominant and most projects even those with a process engineering element or are output based are procured using the FIDIC forms.
It is worth a reminder that there are other standard forms of contract available particularly when performance and operating conditions are a significant factor in the project's success.
IChemE publishes a suite of standard forms of contract which have been developed and published to reflect best practice. These standard forms are published in the English language and offer a lump sum contract, cost reimbursable and target cost pricing options.
The IChemE Red Book is a lump sum and is suitable for a wide range of industries, particularly those where a high technical input is required in design and construction. IChemE publishes the International Red Book which is suitable for international use.
For the purposes of this article, we will consider the following standard forms:
- The FIDIC Conditions of Contract for EPC/Turnkey Projects 1999 Edition known by its better name as the FIDIC Silver Book ("FIDIC Silver Book"); and
- The IChemE International Form of Contract for Lump Sum Contracts (the International Red Book), First Edition 2007 ("IChemE Red Book").
We shall focus on some key provisions which can affect an employer's choices on the appropriate form of contract to deliver a project, those being:
- the overall risk allocation; and
- the testing and commissioning regime.
FIDIC v IChemE
These two standard form contracts are designed and intended to be used for international construction and engineering projects. However, there are significant differences between these two standard forms.
Before selecting the appropriate standard form, the knowledge of the client and its professional team on these two standard forms will be key. It is not uncommon for the FIDIC suite of contracts to be amended to include new and detailed particular conditions. In the Middle East, the FIDIC suite of contracts are typically heavily amended.
Therefore, because the employer and the professional team may have prior working knowledge on a particular standard form this may not always be helpful if new and extensive particular conditions are used.
It is advisable to use the standard form of contract which is best suited to deliver the project and to satisfy the employer's project specific requirements. If the project demands comprehensive testing and commissioning, then the employer should consider all standard form options before selecting the appropriate form for their use.
Click below to download a pdf of the arabic translation.
Related insights
Insights
Update: The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia's newly adopted Ultimate Beneficial Ownership Rules

Insights
Public procurement – the importance of clear tender rules and when to seek clarification of tenders

Insights
High Court case highlights the importance and potential pitfalls of design risk allocation

Key contacts


Related Specialisms
To the Point 
Subscribe for legal insights, industry updates, events and webinars to your inbox
Sign up nowGet up to date with our latest news on LinkedIn
Follow now