The UK Government published its latest NSIA Annual Report on 10 September 2024, covering the period from 1 April 2023 to 31 March 2024. We have reviewed the Report's findings alongside past final orders. Although the transaction review process is generally operating more smoothly, investors and dealmakers should stay mindful of the sectors and origins of investment which attract the most scrutiny, the potential length of timelines involved where the transaction is called in for review, the intrusive nature of typical remedies that are imposed, and the risk of future enforcement activity against parties who fail to notify a mandatory transaction. We also touch on potential reforms to the NSIA regime which appear to have stalled since the July 2024 change in Government.
UK NSIA regime – 2023-2024 trends
Checking whether the NSIA regime applies has become a "routine" step in transactions with a UK nexus. While the vast majority of notifications get cleared within 30 working days of acceptance, without detailed assessment (almost 96% in the latest review period), the risk and potential impact of Government intervention must not be overlooked. In particular:
- a failure to notify a mandatory transaction is a criminal offence and makes any completed deal void, with important ramifications for parties' (including any lenders') ability to enforce related agreements;
- where the Government calls in a transaction, a detailed/ Phase II review may cause significant delays; and
- a Phase II review may lead to the imposition of burdensome remedies, the deal being blocked altogether, or the parties deciding to abandon the transaction.
Based on our analysis of the UK Government's NSIA Annual Report covering the period from 1 April 2023 to 31 March 2024, and of final order notices issued to date (as at 25 September 2024), most of the trends which we identified in our previous update (which you can access here) have broadly continued along the same lines:
1) the NSIA review process remains less burdensome than initially expected and is showing signs of getting smoother – though when looking at the low number of final orders in the reporting period (5 versus 15 in the previous period), the number of notification withdrawals should also be borne in mind (10) as it reflects circumstances where parties decided to abandon a transaction rather than face drastic remedies or a prohibition on the deal going ahead;
2) areas of particular sectoral focus continue to be Defence, Critical Suppliers to Government, Military and Dual-use and Data Infrastructure, while investment originating from China, as well as the UK and "friendly states" such as the USA and Canada continue to attract the most scrutiny; and
3) the remedies imposed tend to be behavioural yet extensive in nature (ranging from security requirements to governance safeguards and reporting obligations), with Energy and Utilities being the most targeted industry sectors – particularly where the assets involved in the transaction are part of the UK's Critical National Infrastructure. In one case, this has even resulted in the Government being given step-in rights.
The following developments are also worth noting:
- Government authorities actively monitor the market for notifiable transactions – over the reporting period, 34 completions of notifiable transactions were identified and 4 unnotified transactions were called in. While the Government is yet to impose any fines or prosecute any offences, we can expect a less lenient approach going forward;
- while overall average review timings have broadly remained consistent, the Investment Security Unit seems to be taking more time to assess initial submissions and confirm its acceptance or rejection of a notification;
- the non-sensitive sector of academic research and development in higher education is increasingly coming under the authorities' lens, with 24% of call-ins involving this sector, versus 11% in 2022-23; and
- since the change in Government in July 2024, anticipated reforms to the NSIA regime appear to have stalled – it remains to be seen whether these are picked up over the coming months.
The good news is that there is a continuing trend with more than 95% of notifications cleared without further assessment. However, the level of intervention at Phase II review stage is significant: around 36% if you combine the number of final orders involving remedies with the number of deals withdrawn. The NSIA regime might not bark in all cases, but when it does, it can bite.
Mark Crane
Partner, Competition & Regulation
You can view our key takeaways packaged into a user-friendly deck of visuals by clicking on the link below.
Next steps
Click on the image to open a PDF of visuals highlighting latest trends from the operation of the NSIA regime.
Related insights
Insights
Outrage over Oasis ticket sales: Can we expect CMA action over use of dynamic pricing for high demand events?
Insights
Reflecting the new status quo: European Commission consults on replacement to its exclusionary abuse of dominance guidelines
Insights
Ireland's new FDI screening mechanism: Navigating the Challenges for Dealmakers
Contributor
Key contacts
Related Specialisms
Related Locations
NATIONAL SECURITY AND FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT SCREENING
Explore the content hubTo the Point
Subscribe for legal insights, industry updates, events and webinars to your inbox
Sign up nowGet up to date with our latest news on LinkedIn
Follow now